1924 was a particularly wonderful year for the man who declared: “I have always loved playing seriously.” Francis Picabia (1879- 1953), the indefatigable artist, writer and enthusiastic letter writer, was working on 391, an avant-garde Paris revue, using it that year to fight on two separate fronts: the academisation of Dada, which he dismissed with one of his polemical, brutally funny texts, and the pretentions of the nascent surrealism of André Breton, which he suspected was only a pathetic means of seizing power in the Parisian art world. He drew, he painted, he chatted with his co-conspirators Marcel Duchamp and Man Ray and between the laughter and the tears, found the time to work on Relâche or on editing his one novel, Caravansérail, which was both autobiographical and lost for a long time, it was only finally published after his death. With devastating cynicism, incomparable lucidity and humour, this Satyricon of modern times is that of an actor and spectator who sends up, sends off and records with jubilation the day’s current inventions and disorders, settling scores, denouncing fakes, blow-hards and pretenders. An ode to movement and to moments of everyday life, between dinners at Prunier and unbridled delights, jazz bands and the new dances, roulette at Monte-Carlo, exhibitions and visits, opium, car races or spiritualism seances at his home on the rue Fontaine, Picabia intertwines the art scene and the Parisian nightlife of the 20’s, mocking André Breton, costing out Eros and blasting the fake values of the artists sucking up to the powers that be. Caravansérail is a literary gem, and Relâche would be the same thing onstage. Both the novel and the dance work show us what it was like at that time, when all of Paris was a party, as Hemingway wrote. This was the time, set during the period between the two World Wars, at the exact moment when the conventions of bourgeois humanism inherited from the 19th century were collapsing, precipitated by the events of 1914- 18 and by the arrival of European fascism and the Nazis, at the end of the international economic debacle which came about after the crash of 1929. Walking on this tightrope strung between two eras, when the dreams of the new Man were flourishing with the art happening all over Europe, from France to Germany, from Italy to Hungary, from Holland to Russia, between Dada, Bauhaus and Constructivism, the renewal of these art forms resonated for Picabia and his friends with the renewal of certain forms of life.

Relegating old forms of blackmail to what he termed “eternal beauty,” to “noble or overly solemn subjects,” it was with ferocity and humour that the man who declared that he preferred “a chair at the Paris Casino to one at the Académie Française,” attacked the art that had become a mere accessory or a piece of bourgeois furniture – a lie which could be bought, a conveyor of conventions, whose declared romanticism or rebellion against command would set off corrosive yet always joyful salvos.

As for Relâche, it was with the complicity of his elder in salutary insolences, Erik Satie, that Picabia conceived it, along with the young, elegant René Clair, an art critic and writer in a sleeping Paris, a director who was an intact breath of freshness, whom he asked to direct the Entr’acte cinématographique which he had sketched out. And Jean Börlin, the dancer and official Swedish choreographer - was assigned the task of translating onto the bodies a part of the choreography of the piece, which was otherwise taken care of by the overwhelming kineticism of the scenographic art object he conceived of as a set, somewhere between blinding sculpture and flashing luminous tableau. He was asked to speak three of the most familiar languages spoken by audiences in certain dark Parisian theatres of the time – music hall, circus and ballet – to twist them into a sort of braid in which quotes and puns and insinuations of a deliberate casualness would undo the normal hierarchies and communicate his enigmas. Between collage and montage and these newer procedures of the art of that time, the curtain went up on a fiction. And while the “bride” of art, once “stripped naked by its bachelors,” gets dressed in order to later undress them – it is to the audience that Picabia asks this question: what is the Entr’acte (something taking place between two acts) for those who are on Relâche (in French the word means a day of no performance, or that the theatre is closed)?

Christophe Wavelet

Credits

An instantaneous ballet in two acts, a cinematographic entracte and The Dog’s Tail
Conception 1924 : Francis Picabia
Music : Erik Satie
Choreography : Jean Börlin
Film : René Clair

Reenactment - 2014

Choreography : Petter Jacobsson and Thomas Caley
Historical research and dramaturgy : Christophe Wavelet
Set design : Annie Tolleter
Lighting : Eric Wurtz
Historiacal research about the 1920s: Carole Boulbès
Costumes : Costume department of CCN - Ballet de Lorraine

Jean Börlin was a Swedish dancer and choreographer who was born in Härnösand on 13 March 1893 and died in New York on 6 December 1930. He worked with Michel Fokine, who was his teacher in Stockholm.

Jean Börlin was much appreciated by Michel Fokine, who later said of the Swedish dancer: ‘He's the one who most resembles me! A natural! An ecstasy! The fanatical sacrifice of a battered body in order to give maximum choreographic expression’.

Trained at the Royal Swedish Ballet School, he joined the troupe in 1905 and was appointed principal dancer by Fokine in 1913. He joined his master in Copenhagen in 1918, then travelled around Europe and discovered modern dance.

On Fokine's recommendation, he was hired by the Swedish Ballet Company, which had just been formed by Rolf de Maré. This marked his debut as a choreographer, as the vast majority of the Swedish Ballet's choreographies bear his name. He danced for the company at a time when it was in constant competition with Serge de Diaghilev's Ballets Russes.

From 1920 onwards, he was principal dancer, teacher, ballet master and choreographer. Hailed by French critics, Börlin was considered the successor to Vaslav Nijinsky.

Jean Börlin died of illness in 1930, aged just 37.

Source: Wikipedia

Lorsque René-Lucien Chomette pousse ses premiers cris, le 11 novembre  1898 à Paris, le cinéma est son aîné de 3 ans, et ils attendront  quelques temps avant de se rencontrer. Elevé dans la capitale française,  il devient ambulancier volontaire au crépuscule de la Première Guerre  Mondiale, et s’essaye ensuite au journalisme, dans les colonnes de "L’Intransigeant",  où il signe ses articles sous le nom de "René Després". Une activité  qu’il continue, quelques années plus tard, en dirigeant le supplément  cinéma de la revue "Théâtre et Comoedia illustré".

Entre temps, il devient René Clair et fait ses premiers pas devant la caméra, en décrochant des rôles dans Le Lys de la vie ou Parisette, réalisés en 1921, et ne met pas longtemps à vouloir passer derrière, puisque c’est en 1923 qu’il réalise Paris qui dort,  moyen métrage teinté de fantastique où il affiche déjà la poésie qui  caractérisera son cinéma. Mais c’est surtout l’année suivante qu’il  signe son premier coup d’éclat : sollicité par le Théâtre des  Champs-Elysées pour leur livrer un court métrage à diffuser pendant  l’entracte d’un ballet, il fait scandale avec son "Entr’acte"  d’inspiration dadaïste.

Plus classiques, même s’ils confirment le goût de leur auteur pour le fantastique, Le Voyage imaginaire (1925) et La Proie du vent (1926) calment un peu le jeu, tout comme ses adaptations, muettes, époque oblige, d’Eugène Labiche que sont Un chapeau de paille d'Italie (1927) et Les Deux timides  (1929). Mais c’est l’arrivée du parlant qui va donner un coup de fouet à  la carrière de René Clair, dont le nom commence à traverser les  frontières suite à la sortie de Sous les toits de Paris  (1930), où le fantastique a laissé place à un discours social et au  réalisme poétique, dont il est l'une des figures aux côtés de Julien Duvivier et Marcel Carné.

Une tendance que confirment Le Million et, surtout, A nous la liberté, satire dans laquelle la Tobis, sa société de production allemande, verra un précurseur des Temps modernes de Charles Chaplin  (1936), ce que René Clair a toujours réfuté. Il faut dire qu’à cette  époque, ce dernier a d’autres soucis en tête, et notamment les échecs du  Dernier Milliardaire (1934) et Fausses Nouvelles (1936), à peine rattrapés par le succès de Fantôme à vendre  (1935), qu’il tourne à Londres. De retour dans l’Hexagone, il voit le  tournage de son film suivant interrompu par la Seconde Guerre Mondiale  et s’enfuit à New York, après des passages par l’Espagne et le Portugal.

Réfugié  outre-Atlantique, le cinéaste profite de l’accueil qui lui est réservé  pour se refaire une santé en signant quatre longs métrages, parmi  lesquels Ma femme est une sorcière (1942), où il iconise l'actrice Veronica Lake, et Dix petits Indiens (1945), considéré comme l’une des plus fidèles adaptations des "Dix petits nègres" d’Agatha Christie. Le conflit et cette parenthèse enchantée terminés, René Clair regagne la France, où il renoue avec le succès, grâce au Silence est d'or (1947), puis La Beauté du Diable (1949), transposition du mythe de "Faust" sur grand écran, où il entame une collaboration avec Gérard Philipe.

Les deux hommes ne mettent pas longtemps à se retrouver, puisque l’acteur est ensuite à l’affiche des Belles de nuit (1952), où débute une certaine Brigitte Bardot, et Les Grandes manoeuvres (1955), premier film en couleurs de René Clair, qui décroche le Prix Louis-Delluc par la même occasion, et dirige ensuite Georges Brassens (dans son propre rôle) le temps de Porte des Lilas, d’après un roman de René Fallet.  Premier cinéaste élu à l’Académie Française, en 1960, il subit  toutefois de plein fouet l’avènement de la Nouvelle Vague, qui en fait  une de ses têtes de turc.

Devenu plus rare, il participe à des films à sketches (La Française et l'amour et Les Quatre vérités), puis signe ses deux derniers longs métrages en solo (Tout l'or du monde avec Bourvil et Les Fêtes galantes avec Jean-Pierre Cassel),  avant de se consacrer au théâtre et à la bande-dessinée, pour répondre à  une demande de l’Académie Française. Décédé le 15 mars 1981, il  s’illustre une dernière fois dans le domaine cinématographique au  Festival de Cannes de 1974 où, en tant que Président du Jury, il offre  le Grand Prix et celui du Scénario à deux américains en pleine ascension  : Francis Ford Coppola et Steven Spielberg. Un juste retour des choses pour ce réalisateur français à qui Hollywood avait permis de s’illustrer.

Source : Maximilien Pierrette

After studies of mathematics preparatory class and medecine studies, Luc Riolon begins to make films within the framework of his Faculty of Medicine, then met the famous choreographers of the 80s (Maguy Marin, Mark Tompkins, Josef Nadj, Daniel Larrieu Daniel, Odile Duboc, Josette Baiz, Angelin Prljocaj, etc.) with whom he shoots numerous films (re-creation for the camera, the illegal securements). In the 80s with the American choreographer Mark Tompkins he introduces the video on the stage, broadcasting live on big screens the images which he shoots with his camera by being on the stage with the dancers, mixing live images and pre-recorded images. With Daniel Larrieu he participates in the creation of the famous show WATERPROOF, the contemporary choreography which takes place in a swimming pool, by filming live) the dancers dancing in the water and mixing the live images with pre-recorded underwater images. This choreography has been shown in many countries (USA, Canada, Spain, England…)
Then he collaborates during 10 years with the famous french TV producer Eve Ruggieri for her programs" Musics in the heart ". He shoots with her of numerous documentaries about classical music, opera singers and dance. From 1999 he directs documentaries of scientific popularization, by following researchers attached to the resolution of a particular ecologic enigma. These two artistic and scientific domains which can seem separated are nevertheless, for Luc Riolon, connected by the same approach : the deep desire to understand the world, by the art or by the scientific research, and to restore it to the largest number. Among his recent scientific documentaries, we can quote for example " The Enigma of the Black Caiman ", Living and dying in the swamp " or " The Nile delta: The end of the miracle ". “Chernobyl, a natural history ? “ These documentaries of scientific popularization recently have been awarded in international festivals.

Source: Vimeo